3 ms·
Arrington's TechCrunch Biased Anti Islam Zionist, Did It Favor Jewish Startups?
- ArabGeek 15y agoYes TC was biased, and why the media wants to make Muslims as terrorist In fact Muslims are the victims not the terrorist. why techcrunch calls islam a satanic religion?
- rick888 15y agoIt's called an opinion. Why has this suddenly become illegal now?
- driverdan 15y agoThe post shows clear bias and misunderstanding, especially in the post comparing it to Satanism. If you had actually read the article you'd see it said it's NOT TRUE. That it's just pattern matching and no such thing is happening. Second, it was comparing pro-Islam audio showing up in unexpected places just like people used to claim the same about Satanism. (eg play some music backwards and you hear pro-Satan lyrics) It was not comparing the two subjects or saying that Islam = Satanism. Third, Satanism isn't what most people think. The Church of Satan, arguably the largest group of so-called Satanists, is actually atheistic. Its members don't believe in the supernatural, Christian or Islamic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_Satan http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_Satan
- ArabGeek 15y agohow biased it is? it is mentioning the truth, even if TC writer did not mean it he should not compare Islam to Sanatism. " "Is Islam the new Satanism?" how wrong and bad this statement. second, TC was backing google to post the "fitan" movie a movie full of lies that falsely accuse Islam of terrorism, and said google needs to "decide between free speech and global jihad.” but when it comes to jews, or criticizing Israel Arrington says "“The first amendment doesn’t apply to private companies.” and demand stuff that criticize the jews to be removed. this is a prof that TC is anti islam and biased to jews Zionism and israel
- burgerbrain 15y agoNo. All that says is that TC recognizes a difference between preventing the de facto censorship of a film, and culling trolls and flamewars on discussion boards. Even if you could reasonably derive the meaning you have from TC's posts, so what? They're allowed to think that, what is your point? I think Islam is evil too... right up there with Judaism and Christianity. Big whoop.
- ArabGeek 15y agoright you said it, you think islam is evil.. this is ignorant from you, why do not be classy and say i disagree with islam and not calling it bad names. however the point here is the writers are accusing Islam of things under free speech and preventing other cretinism israel and jews. for your misconception I suggest you read hhttp://islam-truth.com/ http://islam-truth.com/
- burgerbrain 15y agoI think all religion is evil. Don't feel so special. This isn't ignorant, it is enlightened. To say simply that I disagree with it is not being honest. I disagree with it and I oppose it. In crude terms, I think that it is evil. The same with other religions.
- ArabGeek 15y agoYou are evil
- burgerbrain 15y agoNah, I'm just your standard run of the mill atheist. Common misconception though! There are more of me than you might think however, so you might want to learn about me.
- ArabGeek 15y agoso why do you think all religions are evil and Islam in particular?
- burgerbrain 15y agoI love it when the religious point out the atrocities of other religions, but seemingly lack the introspection to do it to their own religions as well. That said, this article is OT. I think we can do better than to post articles that end with "I am not questioning here the holocaust, nor saying all jews are evil" but starts with a giant image of a racist caricature.
- ArabGeek 15y agoi think the writer is saying that this post is not about the holocaust or a debt about it and that he is not anti all jews, rather pointing out to the bias of TechCrunch and its hate to Islam as such Muslims which affected its coverage. as for the image i see that it shows you that Arrington looks from one eye, the eye of the Zionist jew not a racist pic at all.
- burgerbrain 15y ago"not a racist pic at all." I honestly believe that you sincerely believe that. That is why I am not going to continue this conversation.