3 ms·
Ok, I concede that, it was exagerrated in what I was reading. What do you think about the other point? Was a computer as we know it today practical to design be
by shadowofneptune 5y ago
Ok, I concede that, it was exagerrated in what I was reading. What do you think about the other point? Was a computer as we know it today practical to design before the discovery that arithmetic and other principles of math could be worked out using logic?
- svat 5y agoI'm not an expert (my only qualification is that I read a part of Babbage's book; others must know a lot more), but see http://tomforsyth1000.github.io/blog.wiki.html#%5B%5BBabbage%20was%20a%20true%20genius%5D%5D http://tomforsyth1000.github.io/blog.wiki.html#%5B%5BBabbage... and (linked from it) https://www.fourmilab.ch/babbage/cards.html https://www.fourmilab.ch/babbage/cards.html — it looks like he did have a reasonable design of a computer in fact. (Except for the too-many-digits-of-precision thing, that the OP tweet thread is about.) He seems to have well understood how not just arithmetic but a lot more could be done mechanically.