3 ms·
> someone else’s open source software This feels like an oxymoron: if it's open source licensed there is explicitly no 'owner.'
by mullingitover 5y ago
> someone else’s open source software
This feels like an oxymoron: if it's open source licensed there is explicitly no 'owner.'
- growse 5y agoPerhaps they mean the copyright owner?
- mullingitover 5y agoBut which copyright owner? If the open source project has multiple contributors (not an unusual scenario in the slightest), it's not just a matter of one person's copyrights. Plus you get into the issue of the projects dependencies, and who owns those?
- owenmarshall 5y agoMost of the time this is solved by * requiring code to be assigned by the author to a single person/company, consolidating ownership * building your entire base on friendly licensed software (3BSD) and ducking any GPL So it’s very easy to say, for example, that the Mozilla Foundation owns all the code that makes up Firefox - they won’t accept your pull request otherwise.