3 ms·
IANAL But what you're proposing sounds very dangerous to me. Do you trust that law enforcement is smart enough to recognize that your involvement is philanthr
by smoyer 15y ago
IANAL
But what you're proposing sounds very dangerous to me. Do you trust that law enforcement is smart enough to recognize that your involvement is philanthropic and legal? You'll likely be working with individuals that these agencies deem to be criminal and the old saying guilty by association is still true. And if you prove your innocence, what have you spent in the process?
I actually tend to agree with you, but you should also look at the history of Anonymous ... to my eyes, it's becoming less charitable, and more destructive.
Good luck!
- SoftwareMaven 15y agoThese thoughts are, of douse, why I've kept my distance. The alternative (playing in the rules) only sees to work if you've got 10+ digit incomes. I'm trying to find the third option.