> Love is chemicals & emotions No, love is not chemicals & emotions but the state of chemicals & emotions that is cause-effect for inter-human attraction/stabl

> Love is chemicals & emotions No, love is not chemicals & emotions but the state of chemicals & emotions that is cause-effect for inter-human attraction/stable togetherness. Wow! IMAGINE THINKING LOVE EVOLVED at some point in time. There are other issues as well. To start off if I defined love minimally as that which is the cause of attraction then, --- What is the cause of attraction between poles of a magnet? * Using the socratic method, the concept of an "ideal North Pole" is inseparable from the "ideal South Pole", their togetherness is eternal and when they are not together they are attracted to be together, when they are together it is sustainable, so much so that the reason for their creation is for the other to exist. Why do they behave so though? Because they are "circular". No they are not circular jk but because they have a "natural configuration" or simply put its their "nature". Nature of circles is to roll, similarly, what is an object that has nature is to be attracted to this subject. --- Love itself, is eternal, and has no origin. It is name for a "thing"(conceptual, abstract, but a noun), like a circle. We say one's mind is in prayer but technically whole of their "natural configuration" is praying. Similarly, we say someone's body is in the game, but their whole self is involved. Similarly thus, heart is in love but their "whole configuration" is in the act of active loving, during their existence. At the very least it must NOT be taken for granted that a common subset of such configuration exists for all humans. Nature of their lover is subjective to lovers. Furthermore, to end, when you study the properties of theos and of love, they turn out to be same 'things'; god is love and love is god. OP needs to read about what they are writing.