3 ms·
You're totally missing the point. The author points the fact that issuing "GET /interesting-article.html" should NOT have any side-effect. This is the GET that
by nakkiel 15y ago
You're totally missing the point. The author points the fact that issuing "GET /interesting-article.html" should NOT have any side-effect. This is the GET that should not have any side-effect. The other GET or POST or whatever it is is the side-effect.
The author goes as far as criticizing other side-effects already in place; an example of which is ads. Because you see when you browse an article about Herpes, then you encounter ads about Herpes drugs on every website.
I got hit by this while looking for paid webmails. After a few searches on Google, I started to see ads for atmail on every single page.
There are people who believe it's a violation and I'm one of them.
EDIT: please don't point at Do Not Track or other work-arounds because that's all they are.
- zhoutong 15y agoWhen you browse the web, you don't GET the pages. Your browser does much more than that. If you really GET the page and parse the HTML yourself, you won't get these ads, for sure. If Facebook uses POST in their JavaScript, then what's wrong?