> Though to be fair on actions v. words, even if the two don't match up, I wouldn't say it invalidates the words. I think that even when two people agree on th

> Though to be fair on actions v. words, even if the two don't match up, I wouldn't say it invalidates the words. I think that even when two people agree on the problem statement; political take might make them differ greatly on what they think the correct solution is. That doesn't "invalidate the words" even if you think that the proposed solution is e.g. unethical, impractical, not likely to actually fix the problem, captured by a big business, mere crowd-pleasing window-dressing, or otherwise inadvisable. The actions indicate how a person responds to a belief. It's relevant. For example, in the context of globalization, an answer is "just prevent the globalization of industrialization". An answer to immigration was "build a border wall". Supporting those answers might make you a bad person, will reveal a lot about your actual politics, but does not "invalidate the words".