3 ms·
> nobody is actually going to look beyond the lock anyway. (Yes, I know there'll be someone somewhere who eventually does, let's just agree that "nobody" is a
by y-c-o-m-b 5y ago
> nobody is actually going to look beyond the lock anyway. (Yes, I know there'll be someone somewhere who eventually does, let's just agree that "nobody" is a number that rounds to 0%.) I mean seriously, do you ever do this?
Yes, yes I do... did. I'm in the US and get a vast array of bills coming from all kinds of different sources (utilities, doctors, etc.) that manage their payments via some random portal. Some of the "payment portals" they send me to are sketchy as hell and it brings me great anxiety to use them even though it's guarantees my payment arrives on time and I don't have to fuss with snail mail (and its associated thefts). I always make sure they are https and I used to look "beyond the lock" to make sure they a well-known CA was being used. Well as Troy mentions, it's effectively a worthless endeavor. I'm glad he's bringing this topic up to gain more visibility and awareness towards the issue.
- bombcar 5y agoThis is a huge problem - legitimate sites are getting names that look damn scammy - even "www.securebillpay.net" starts to look suspicious and they get way worse. If the companies aren't going to bother there's no hope for the users.
- jimmygrapes 5y agoccbill.net is the one I've always been the most skeptical about, since I associate it with age verification things decades ago for certain sites that were not serviced by other payment providers