> and there are differences and different drives, but not to the extent people interpret them to be. Do you have any meaningful data that backs those claims up

> and there are differences and different drives, but not to the extent people interpret them to be. Do you have any meaningful data that backs those claims up? I mean, first of all - "not to the extent people interpret them to be" - which people, more precisely, and what's that extent? And secondly, how do you know that it's not to that extent? Don't want to be pedantic here, but we could be rambling on about how "people say this, but it's actually like that" all day long - show me the numbers, how they were obtained, and your interpretation of them and we can discuss, something like [1], hopefully. [1] https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0261438 https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal...