> This is textbook example of a "whataboutism" argument. I point out one group of people who have done something wrong, and you point out another group of peopl

> This is textbook example of a "whataboutism" argument. I point out one group of people who have done something wrong, and you point out another group of people who have (arguably) also done something wrong, as if it is some kind of justification. Two wrongs don't make a right. Oh, it's realy not - you presented an experiment (Grievance studies affair) as an example of "how wokes are corrupting science in order to advance their political agenda". But what you cite is a terrible, deeply flawed experiment which proves no such thing. So in answer to your question if it wasn't obvious; no, it's not sufficient.