> If you don't want to take an active role in maintaining security on your computer, then by all means use a commercial operating system. Pay a license and let

> If you don't want to take an active role in maintaining security on your computer, then by all means use a commercial operating system. Pay a license and let Microsoft and Apple make those decisions for you. They have competent people who can program reasonable default settings for the average user. If you're running Linux or an open source operating system, you've already decided to take these responsibilities into your own hands. That is a beyond ridiculous take. The last Windows OS that did not make me mad was Win98, and every time I have to use Mac machines I want to gouge my eyeballs out. I want an OS that lets me shoot myself in the foot as much as I want. > If you're running Linux or an open source operating system, you've already decided to take these responsibilities into your own hands. no, I just want to use the fastest possible OS for my use case on my hardware, which is Linux.