4 ms·
Without the pro version it's not reliable: > If a Sidekiq process crashes while processing a job, that job is lost. [0] We use Sidekiq Pro at work but I find
by waffle_maniac 5y ago
Without the pro version it's not reliable:
> If a Sidekiq process crashes while processing a job, that job is lost. [0]
We use Sidekiq Pro at work but I find it unfortunate that reliability is a pro feature. It's really hard to tell a product owner: Yeah, we might lose a few jobs once in a while.
[0] https://sidekiq.org/products/pro.html https://sidekiq.org/products/pro.html
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- aaronbrethorst 5y agoSeems like a good reason to pay Mike.
- jdc0589 5y agoagree. its not a lot of money, or it didn't used to be last time I looked. If your org relies heavily on it just pay
- aaronbrethorst 5y agoI just looked this up. It's $995/year, or approximately 4% of the fully loaded cost of an FTE software engineer at most companies. i.e. about 3 weeks of a developer's time.
- waffle_maniac 5y agoI understand paying extra for niche features. Isn't reliability a core feature of background job software?
- waffle_maniac 5y agoWe do pay for it. Perhaps you could address my point? Open source background job software that isn't reliable by default? That makes sense?