3 ms·
I'm not so sure if this number means anything. Don't get me wrong: I'd love to see G+ succeed, so that FB has some serious competition. But despite nearly 2-doz
by ajays 15y ago
I'm not so sure if this number means anything. Don't get me wrong: I'd love to see G+ succeed, so that FB has some serious competition. But despite nearly 2-dozen early adopter friends on G+, it feels pretty empty. Initially they used to post updates a couple of times a day, and now it's rare to see more than 1 update per week.
Unless Google does something drastic, I feel G+ is going to die a slow death.
- OriginalSyn 15y agoMost of the people I know that use it, use it more like twitter, including myself. I follow a lot of people I find interesting, like Wil Wheaton and Paul Irish, they are both really active and post interesting, to me, stuff, which I comment on and reshare and occasionally post stuff I find interesting. Then there is the vast majority of my actual friends and family that just read the content and maybe +1 once in a while. It's basically the 1% rule where 90% of the people lurk, 9% of the people contribute and 1% create content.
- faragon 15y agoGoogle could buy Netflix to expand Youtube with worldwide paid content coverage, and generate more momentum for expanding G+.
- r00fus 15y agoI use it primarily to send kids party photos to parents who are on G+. Very limited shares but don't need to spam the emails and the circles will grow! Lots of public activity? Nope. Important tool and more secure than Facebook? Sure feels that way...
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]