3 ms·
India doesn't have the power to use a block explorer. It is to advanced. >AEs have the political power to control the crypto companies. The recent instance >wh
by honungsburk 5y ago
India doesn't have the power to use a block explorer. It is to advanced.
>AEs have the political power to control the crypto companies. The recent instance >where the US recovered bitcoins from the hackers of the oil pipeline in US, is an >example that notwithstanding claims of non-traceability of cryptocurrencies, AE >Governments wield enough power to access the records. India or most other > countries would lack such advantages.
- ClumsyPilot 5y agoWhat? Why?
- sundarurfriend 5y agoI think it's a sarcastic comment, saying a "block explorer" is all it takes to trace these and implying that the document is dumb for saying otherwise. I don't know the details of the case well enough, but this is a usual type of comment on HN, and my a priori assumption would be it's probably oversimplifying reality and ignoring context as is also usual.
- jeffparsons 5y ago> claims of non-traceability of cryptocurrencies Uh, who's claiming that? Cryptocurrency transactions are _super_ traceable.
- bo1024 5y agoThe same speaker claims it earlier, for one. The speech seems mostly well informed but that stuck out.
- tejasvi88 5y agoThey are referring to > AEs have the political power to control the crypto companies. You won't find scammer's name on block explorer.