2 ms·
With that definition you can argue humans aren't intelligent at all. The environments we operate in are very limited compared to for example extremophiles. I do
by rowanG077 5y ago
With that definition you can argue humans aren't intelligent at all. The environments we operate in are very limited compared to for example extremophiles. I doubt anyone would argue extremophiles are of genius level intellect compared to humans. That definition can be falsified in dozens of ways. That doesn't mean it can't be useful of course.
- PeterisP 5y agoIDK, humans can achieve all kinds of goals not only in temperate climates but also underwater, in the Antarctic and even in outer space; and in the environments where extremophiles operate we can do all kinds of interesting things that they can't. It's not about the capabilities of unassisted body - I can influence stuff in a volcano without sticking my bare hands in it.