And they're clearly not interested in making money since they've abandoned the project and are going bankrupt, so none of what you said has any validity here.

And they're clearly not interested in making money since they've abandoned the project and are going bankrupt, so none of what you said has any validity here. Should houses collapse when the builder goes out of business? Should people be banned from living in them or making custom repairs because "What about the company's creditors!" Precluding a third party from performing after market-maintenance on a dead product and forbidding a current user to continue using something they paid for isn't capitalist--it's anticapitalist and purely spiteful.