> Well first, you took a well-meaning article discussing how HN can be toxic. You can look at the article as an attack on a forum's reputation, and consequentl

> Well first, you took a well-meaning article discussing how HN can be toxic. You can look at the article as an attack on a forum's reputation, and consequently on their users, by fabricating baseless blanket accusations of being a toxic community, when in truth at most it just shows people disagreeing or pointing out misconceptions and factual errors. Would we be toxic if a random troll started insisting that the sky was green and the community posted that the troll was wrong and the sky was in fact blue?