4 ms·
The restriction is really “use it or lose it”. I don’t see how that would influence anything. If they are investing and plan to use it, then they retain all val
by ViViDboarder 5y ago
The restriction is really “use it or lose it”. I don’t see how that would influence anything. If they are investing and plan to use it, then they retain all value. If they chose not to use it, they can sell it to someone who will or release it into public domain.
There is still a huge potential for earning by investing in something like this, even with restrictions as described.
- Johnny555 5y agoIf they chose not to use it, they can sell it to someone Well, they can sell it to someone who is willing to continue supporting it for the use that the original company couldn't make work. or release it into public domain Yeah, that "lose it" part is the problem - if they can't find a company that's willing to continue supporting what was already proven to be an unsuccessful use case, then their IP has no value.
- dcow 5y agoIt is lose it. That’s the point.
- anamax 5y ago> If they chose not to use it, they can sell it to someone who will You're assuming that someone else can make it work financially in the original domain, but what if no one can? The IP may have value in other domains, but you seem to be saying that it goes into the public domain if no one can make it work in the original domain. If that's the rule on IP with medical uses, medical applications just went to the bottom of the list of uses. In fact, you'd be stupid to go for a medical application of IP that is used elsewhere.