4 ms·
The article is incredibly misleading. They don't mention the year that the events in the first paragraph happened until halfway down the page and even if you re
by weird-eye-issue 5y ago
The article is incredibly misleading. They don't mention the year that the events in the first paragraph happened until halfway down the page and even if you read that far you might not have connected the two.
Her implant failing is not even related to the company going bankrupt (although maybe it was a precursor)
- YeBanKo 5y agoThe article is not even a slightly bit misleading, if you read it in full and without any prior expectation or reading other comments. Here is a quote: "took hundreds of patients on a roller-coaster ride of technological innovations, regulatory successes, medical and financial setbacks, and a near-total meltdown" – this is not simply about how they abandoned the tech or almost went bankrupt. This is also about the challenges they and their patients faced along the way.