3 ms·
The quality of transcription on Gutenberg is rough, especially for older transcriptions. Standard eBooks are much higher quality, but selection is limited becau
by mmastrac 5y ago
The quality of transcription on Gutenberg is rough, especially for older transcriptions. Standard eBooks are much higher quality, but selection is limited because of the effort gap.
I processed two books from Gutenberg for SE (Devil's Dictionary and a smaller scifi novel) and both were quite a bit of work to bang the books into shape (half the work was metadata enhancement, half was proofreading and correcting)
EDIT: After comparing, it's definitely just the raw Gutenburg scan w/formatting. You can see a big batch of fixed typos that weren't applied here: https://github.com/standardebooks/ambrose-bierce_the-devils-dictionary/commit/29ad2c4feb90d579b190a9a2898116db4259dcd3 https://github.com/standardebooks/ambrose-bierce_the-devils-...
- zozbot234 5y agoPerhaps, but Gutenberg is adding a huge amount of good quality content as of late, thanks to their Distributed Proofreaders community. Older content will soon be a small fraction of the total, and much of it will be picked up and updated to current standards.
- mmastrac 5y agoThe DP stuff is better, for sure. The first book I did was DP and it was far less 'buggy' than the older one. The issues were mostly formatting.