> Isn't the whole point of taxes that they are for spending we don't get to choose, because if we did, it wouldn't happen? No, the point is that as a city we s

> Isn't the whole point of taxes that they are for spending we don't get to choose, because if we did, it wouldn't happen? No, the point is that as a city we should be able to choose, not individually. I said if my local election decides we should be able to funnel our property tax dollars to vouchers then we should be allowed to do that. I don't mean each individual gets to decide what line-item taxes they're paying that year. > WHile special needs may be segregated, they are still funded by the general pool, you completely failed to address his argument I said we should separate the funding for special needs because it's fundamentally a different cost structure and hides inefficiencies in the non-special needs costs. > You also seem to say criticize his opinion for not being in a school this decade, so are you arguing that maybe people who are say, more expert in schools, should make schooling decisions and not just any old person, say someone handed a voucher I think people whose kids are in school should get to decide. I criticized his opinion because it seems like he's trying to impose his one-size-fits-all public option when he's neither a parent nor a student. The US has never been a technocracy. > Instead of fixing a sinking boat, it just figures out a way for some to get to lifeboats Curious how you think we can do better. The US spends the most out of any nation on education per capita and has among the poorest outcomes out of any developed nation. More money doesn't fix the sinking boat, it just lets it take on more water before it sinks. Vouchers aren't perfect but I think they're better than pouring more money into a black hole with no accountability.