3 ms·
I think the important part of this discussion is that the finality of payments sit outside of the mechanics of the financial system. For instance - when a wire
by aeturnum 5y ago
I think the important part of this discussion is that the finality of payments sit outside of the mechanics of the financial system. For instance - when a wire transfer is "reversed" that is accomplished with another wire transfer (or some other series of administratively triggered actions). For both cryptocurrency and normal currency the system is a series of transactions that are treated as valid for a particular period of time. The decision to consider a transaction final or not exists outside of that accounting system.
The fatal flaw of crypto currencies (edit: in this regard!) is they have comparably high fees built into the mechanics of their accounting systems. What a bank can do for "free" (really just very low cost) in fiat would compete for scarce transaction slots in crypto.
- dmurray 5y ago> What a bank can do for "free" (really just very low cost) in fiat would compete for scarce transaction slots in crypto. This doesn't seem to be the problem. If 1% of transactions need a second transaction to reverse them, we can amortize this cost over all transactions and say reversibility adds on average 1% to transaction costs - hardly significant when choosing a payment mechanism. Reversing significantly more transactions than that isn't normal. If you try to reverse 10% of your credit card payments, you'll soon need a new credit card issuer.