3 ms·
This is silly and underscores my point about splitting hairs while completely ignoring the bigger picture. They were not just focused on the tanks. That was on
by DisjointedHunt 5y ago
This is silly and underscores my point about splitting hairs while completely ignoring the bigger picture.
They were not just focused on the tanks. That was one component of the structure which involved Spacex testing propulsive landings using test articles of varying designs. . And this is the crucial part. . . While designing those test articles and iterating on the manufacturing systems AT THE SAME TIME.
The tanks are silly to make a point about was the response above if that was unclear. It was one component that was going through changes with the rest of the system in a revolutionary way that has never been done before. Not during the falcon development process or any other rocket development process going back to the Apollo era.
Blank sheet -> Starbase today is ridiculously complex. Each element in of itself that I outlined above takes YEARS. Arguing in a silly way about “oh my, they did take two years, well, technically, kinda, with these caveats” is such a stupid way to approach the measurement of progress where , while being completely wrong , is also not constructive to the discussion.
- thereddaikon 5y agoI don't even know what point you are trying to make now. You say im wrong but then go on to say the same thing I already said.
- PeterHolzwarth 5y agoSaying that someone's comment is "silly," "such a stupid way," and "completely wrong" is also, as you put it, "not constructive to the discussion."
- DisjointedHunt 5y agoI agree, i apologize. There is no excuse for insults such as those in civil discussion.