4 ms·

But still you're here getting only the definition that you want to take and ignoring all the other stuff about wokes fighting for their ideals by trying to cens

But still you're here getting only the definition that you want to take and ignoring all the other stuff about wokes fighting for their ideals by trying to censor, ban, fire those who have different ideas, instead of discussing... I already told you that their attention to those things is not the problem but is the attitude no? Let's say that I am a guy, attentive to social justice, noble. Then I am that same guy who reads about someone trying to talk bad about social justice, I converse with him (good), I start calling him names, want his head, want him banned and alienated (bad) So this is an invite to go further than the definition and that point that you egregiously understood

feurio 5y ago
I've invited you to give me an alternative definition - can you just tack on an extra sentence to the Wikipedia, Merriam-Webster or Goole definitions please? Once you have defined what woke is then you can talk about what they do. Wanting people banned, censored, fired are actions that can be carried out by anyone. Vladimir Putin has people banned, censored, fired (and worse), but he's not woke, is he? We're having a converstion, but for you to make a valid point that people are doing these thing then you need to present examples. You couldn't/wouldn't present an example of the newspaper wokeness that you suggest is happening. Give me just one (your best) concrete example of this woke culture in action and you'll have made a point, otherwise this is all just angels dancing on the head of pin territory.