I'm going to posit that the burden is on the person carrying both an empty briefcase as far as new information/insight and the word "idiot" is also carrying the

I'm going to posit that the burden is on the person carrying both an empty briefcase as far as new information/insight and the word "idiot" is also carrying the burden to issue a substantiative challenge to a thesis that is legible if not eloquent. What part of "I'd much prefer to hold USDC than USDT personally because I think not all accountants are Arthur Anderson-level criminals" are you objecting to exactly? Use your words.