4 ms·

Their privacy issues are really starting to bother me, enough for me to consider deactivating my account. The one that has really gotten my goat is when you ta

Their privacy issues are really starting to bother me, enough for me to consider deactivating my account. The one that has really gotten my goat is when you tag a photo with your friend on it. Even if you have privacy set so that only your friends can view your photos, if you tag your friend in one of your photos, ALL OF THEIR FRIENDS CAN NOW SEE IT. You can't change this setting. It's called something like "Friend of friends can see tagged photos." You have no control over this, and the only one who can change this is your friend that you tagged. This is now forcing me to never tag any of my friends, because I don't want strangers seeing my photos. It means effectively that I've lost control of my privacy on my photos, and that's something that is enough to drive me away from Facebook permanently.

dreamux 15y ago
You're right that sucks. But if you think about it it's probably more of a technical issue than evil policy, just imagine the permission graph for visiting one of your friend's profiles -- FB would have to do a reverse lookup of all of you friend's friends and filter ones with closed photo sharing (or what if you are a friend common to both?). Further, scaling that out to 750M people is non-trivial. Anyways, I'm not excusing their policy, but I expect they'll fix it whenever it is technically possible to do so.
- eftpotrm 15y ago
  No, it's not significantly more difficult than the existing case. You have one permissions set - my permissions on my photos. And another permissions set - my friends' visibility sets on their tagging. The display set is the interaction between these two sets, which any database developer should be trivially able to calculate. I don't for one minute dispute that the scaling issues for calculating these interactions for 750m users are significant, but the core task definitely isn't.
pandaassembly 15y ago
In my opinion we have seen quiete a positive development on FB in regards to the control and usability of the privacy options recenttly, most likely triggered through the appearence of Google+. Most, if not all the people I know, have long restricted their profile to a minimum visibility level for non-fiends and non real friends. At the moment I do not see the privacy problem as big as it used to be 12 months ago.
- mhlakhani 15y ago
  A lot of people in my network had restricted their profiles as well. However, due to some change (I guess around two weeks ago), most of those profiles are somewhat open again, and I can access information that was blocked before. I really dislike having to lock down my profile again everytime Facebook changes this stuff.

dreamux 15y ago

You're right that sucks. But if you think about it it's probably more of a technical issue than evil policy, just imagine the permission graph for visiting one of your friend's profiles -- FB would have to do a reverse lookup of all of you friend's friends and filter ones with closed photo sharing (or what if you are a friend common to both?). Further, scaling that out to 750M people is non-trivial. Anyways, I'm not excusing their policy, but I expect they'll fix it whenever it is technically possible to do so.

eftpotrm 15y ago
No, it's not significantly more difficult than the existing case. You have one permissions set - my permissions on my photos. And another permissions set - my friends' visibility sets on their tagging. The display set is the interaction between these two sets, which any database developer should be trivially able to calculate. I don't for one minute dispute that the scaling issues for calculating these interactions for 750m users are significant, but the core task definitely isn't.

pandaassembly 15y ago

In my opinion we have seen quiete a positive development on FB in regards to the control and usability of the privacy options recenttly, most likely triggered through the appearence of Google+. Most, if not all the people I know, have long restricted their profile to a minimum visibility level for non-fiends and non real friends. At the moment I do not see the privacy problem as big as it used to be 12 months ago.

mhlakhani 15y ago
A lot of people in my network had restricted their profiles as well. However, due to some change (I guess around two weeks ago), most of those profiles are somewhat open again, and I can access information that was blocked before. I really dislike having to lock down my profile again everytime Facebook changes this stuff.