3 ms·
I think you underestimate the training/socializing effects of being raised with advertising, and the steps toward closing that gap already underway. You can bu
by svnt 5y ago
I think you underestimate the training/socializing effects of being raised with advertising, and the steps toward closing that gap already underway.
You can buy discounted TVs (and in some places they are the only TVs you can buy), which clearly have advertisements on them that others do not.
When more people wake up my bet is they will be accustomed to advertising, they will just want better advertising. And if one can get paid for receiving short-form entertainment with relevant product information, with appropriate branding I bet there is a market.
- rglullis 5y agoI replied in the other thread. The flaw in your argument is that the only way for "better advertisement" is through personal data selling. Brave's model has shown that you can have a ad distribution system that gives more power to the users, the ads are still relevant, fraud is much more easily detected and it can still reward the users for their attention. With zero knowledge proofs, you can even have a system where the advertisers only get to show ads for those that match certain criteria, but no personal data needs to be given away. If you are working on anything that depends on direct exploitation of user data, I urge to go back to the drawing board and seriously consider the morality of it.
- hackerfromthefu 5y agoFully agreed with the last paragraph - consider the morality of direct exploitation of user data, and the risks that it is used in ways not originally intended. Maybe read some history too such as McCarthyism, Stalinism and many related instances throughout history. This data exploitation that has swept through the world has the potential to be a terrible nightmare in the making.