3 ms·
"For me, the state-sponsored space exploration of space (particularly, the Space Race) slowed down progress in the sciences and even for space exploration in th
by fsloth 5y ago
"For me, the state-sponsored space exploration of space (particularly, the Space Race) slowed down progress in the sciences and even for space exploration in the long run."
I strongly disagree. A rocket engine is so complex, I think nation state level investment in a war economy moved it forward at least half a century, if not more.
It took them seven years just to create the first turbo-pump!
Without Nazi-Germany bankrolling von Braun and his Space Nazis, USA and Soviet Union would not have had the seed to start their ICBM programs.
Which then fed everything else. Without Apollo program, you would not have had the huge airforce talent to figure out how to operate in space.
Space has nothing trivial in it. Each step has required carefull engineering.
I kind of agree that with modern computing we probably could make a few leaps, but difficult engineering up to this day has required century or more of groundwork.
For example Nokia did not become the fallen giant due to some VC investment in the 80's but because they had long tradition of radio engineering going back to 20's. And so on.
SpaceX is now so succesful, because they have a century of aeronautics training, research and culture - bankrolled to a large extent by US taxpayers (for which we in other countries should be grateful for facilitating the future of space faring humanity) to lean on. It's still a huge achievement but without the century of defense spending it would not be even remotely possible.
I would say that the tech is only now mature enough to facilitate the public ventures.
But that's just me, you might be correct as well :)
- wnkrshm 5y agoI want to add: If you look at the tools and theoretical underpinnings spaceX uses to develop their vehicles, they didn't develop them themselves. Numerical simulation methods, especially for hypersonic flow, powder-bed fusion, CAD etc. - those were invented by other people and for the most part all of the numerical methods involved come from DoD work, where they were first developed and verified. FEA? DoD. Finite-Differences? DoD. All kinds of clever methods for mechanical/thermal/optical simulation? DoD. It's almost sad how much of modern engineering depends on that basis. Edit: If you look at old papers for numerical methods, especially in wave optics, most of the time you see a fighter or a bomber in the results - gotta estimate that radar cross-section for when the cold war gets hot.