Just want to advocate that, while the difference isn't currently so large that it's obviously visible, Firefox already has better Ublock Origin support than Chr

Just want to advocate that, while the difference isn't currently so large that it's obviously visible, Firefox already has better Ublock Origin support than Chrome (and by extension, Brave) have. This kind of comes down to what your tolerance is for the occasional ad slipping through -- if you need the best Ublock Origin support right now, use Firefox right now. If you only care at the point where it becomes really noticeable, then maybe that won't matter until after Manifest V3 becomes a requirement. Anecdotally I run into people who say that Safari's adblocking is fine, and if those people feel that way about Safari, they aren't going to view the loss in effectiveness on Chrome as being a dealbreaker post Manifest V3. So I also kind of wonder how many people are actually going to switch just because they lose Ublock Origin.