3 ms·

To be specific, my experience was from non-web software. I would consider "junior" here not as a person in non-critical role who cannot function as an individu

by fsloth 5y ago

To be specific, my experience was from non-web software. I would consider "junior" here not as a person in non-critical role who cannot function as an individual contributor, but as a solid candidate that lacks industry experience but can be at the moment hiring be expected to quite fast grow into the role of a solid IC. I.e to use a bit too stereotypical characterization - not a "stablehand" but a "journeyman apprentice". At the moment of hiring you don't count on it that they can deliver (but guess and hope), whereas the seniors will have shipped products under their belt.

urthor 5y ago
Oh well that's fine. My brain just operates very strictly as: Junior = apprentice, first job or similar. Mid = journeyman, "worked another job before". Independent, trusted to be delegated to for specific things, but doesn't quite have a personal brand. Senior = Master. Proven track record, proven reputation of delivering, capable of leadership inside a technical project. Has and maintains a reputation as someone you can trust. Principal = Mentor to seniors. Ofc there are shades of grey between junior and mid, because junior-ship takes like 2-3 years to grow out of. The list of work able to be delegated to someone at the start is not all that large in many cases.