> I've read countless articles like this by now, where you go through the whole 'novel', and the information you were looking for is on paragraph 67 out of 103,

> I've read countless articles like this by now, where you go through the whole 'novel', and the information you were looking for is on paragraph 67 out of 103, and it's basically the line "Well, we don't really know." That's basically the outcome here. It talks briefly about a few different approaches and doesn't really touch on the likelihood of success. I just grepped for " AI" and read the few paragraphs that popped up. Although looking for "algorithm" proved slightly more interesting: > For now, the mysteries of the Indus script continue to elude decipherment. Last year, in a follow-up paper to their work automating the decoding of Ugaritic and Linear B, Luo and his team made a small but crucial advance: an algorithm aimed at identifying possible related languages of undeciphered writing systems. Potentially, this could help address the problem of deciphering scripts that don’t yet have a known language they can be compared against. When Luo and his team tested their model on the Iberian language, which has historically been linked to Basque, their findings suggested the two languages were not in fact close enough to be related — a conclusion that corroborated recent scholarship on the matter. I'd want to see this applied to dolphin clicks. Not sure it would get anywhere, but if an existing human language turns out to have similar grammatical and linguistic constructs, it might get the ball rolling on communicating.