Photography was yes, of course, but it's use in archaeology was pretty basic, usually just recording artefacts. It was nothing like as advanced as crime scene p

Photography was yes, of course, but it's use in archaeology was pretty basic, usually just recording artefacts. It was nothing like as advanced as crime scene photography, which was very well developed and regularised by that time. The context within which finds were discovered just wasn't as valued back then. All I'm saying is that the chances that such photos exist, while not zero, is fairly low.