3 ms·
3$/gallon sounds so cheap to me. I'm paying almost 2.5$/liter. I'm pretty sure that will reduce emissions massively more than any change in fuel composition whe
by consp 5y ago
3$/gallon sounds so cheap to me. I'm paying almost 2.5$/liter. I'm pretty sure that will reduce emissions massively more than any change in fuel composition wherever the fuel comes from.
- bradknowles 5y agoThat’s European-style taxes for you. Sadly. You get a lot of benefits from European-style government, like socialized medicine. But then you also have to pay those taxes.
- friedturkey 5y agoOr just countries that don't subsidize fuel or cheaply produce it on their own. Taxes are just one factor in the price.
- ThePowerOfFuet 5y agoMoney well spent.
- mschuster91 5y agoThe thing is, taxes here are used as a nudge. Meaning, you have decent public transport (subsidized by said taxes) and as a result people are incentivized to commute with said public transport instead of the government having to build 20+ lanes [1] highways. [1]: https://www.cntraveler.com/story/the-worlds-widest-highway-spans-a-whopping-26-lanes https://www.cntraveler.com/story/the-worlds-widest-highway-s...
- bradknowles 5y agoTaxes are likewise used a nudge here in the US. Where allowed by the special interests, and only so far as it supports those special interests.
- baq 5y agonothing sad about being incentivized to drive less.
- titzer 5y agoEurope and the rest of the world is paying something closer to the true cost of using fossil fuels. Although, with compounding climate change, prices are not keeping up. They are, in effect, subsidizing North America and China's addiction to cheap fossil fuels, which are cheap because externalities are not priced in, and are additionally subsidized by NA governments.