I kinda agree, I think. We’d have to get down to use cases for me to see if we’re on the same page. For me, a certain aspect of the pathological process here i

I kinda agree, I think. We’d have to get down to use cases for me to see if we’re on the same page. For me, a certain aspect of the pathological process here is one that ties to correct the pathalogical symptom. I don’t think any process that plays whack-a-mole at symptoms will ever have much success. The quote that springs to mind is Henry David Thoreau “There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root.” So I’m ok with the assertion that well founded process can/should guide behavior, but if we just throw exceptional process corrections at exceptional behavior as mentioned in the article, we get gridlock and the classic story of “why we can’t have nice things.”