3 ms·

Given we're talking about Canada's democracy, constitutional democracy is implied. Thanks anyway for performing the tedium of explaining the differences for our

• notacoward 5y ago
  It's entirely possible to take a side on the ideological issue(s) without having a stake in a particular application, and it's extremely disingenuous to pretend otherwise. Don't pretend to be a disinterested observer and then selectively repeat one side's claims. The fact that you haven't supported those claims with anything but insult ("you're kidding yourself") doesn't make them neutral.
  • disambiguation 5y ago
    You're trying really hard to get this dunk but you're just completely wrong. I'm not being disingenuous and I never claimed to be a disinterested observer; in fact, an interested observer is exactly what I am. That's also very different from "picking a side". Like watching the superbowl because you care about the outcome, but don't support one team over the other. You just want to see a good, fair game. Having an ideological stance is also very different from "picking a side". I'm not automatically friends or allies with people who happen to share a view with me. I'm not automatically enemies with someone that holds different or opposite views. Further you've conflated an objective observation with an ideological one. The sky is blue. Water is wet. Executive figures with armies are a greater threat to the people than the freight labor class. This claim doesn't need "proving", it's reinforced by history. Feel free to challenge yourself to find evidence to the contrary instead of trying to saddle the burden on someone else.