4 ms·
Considering that: - the vaccines are relatively new and long term effects are unknowable, - efficacy against the current variant questionable and - the curre
by ComradePhil 5y ago
Considering that:
- the vaccines are relatively new and long term effects are unknowable,
- efficacy against the current variant questionable and
- the current variant being mild enough even in unvaccinated populations
it is perfectly reasonable to have a significant percentage of the population to be unvaccinated, just to have a control for long term studies and for backup in case horrible side-effects come up in the long run.
The vaccine makers will try to argue otherwise and try to sell as much as possible, which is why the governments should have made strong commitments to make it strictly optional and prohibited any private attempts to make it mandatory.
Instead, we have seen most world politicians act as if they were completely bought out by the vaccine manufacturers.
- Nursie 5y agoOr, you know, completely in line with the public health measures needed to end a pandemic. One or the other.
- lifeplusplus 5y agothe more unvaccinated, the more spread, more mutations, and more risk of continuing pandemic for years.