3 ms·
You're drawing a false equivalence between "contracts between private parties" and "private properties" By and large, the government does not come take away yo
by mwint 5y ago
You're drawing a false equivalence between "contracts between private parties" and "private properties"
By and large, the government does not come take away your freedom for breach of private party contracts. There are some exceptions, where we wrote law (government mandate) elevating some types of private party contract.
But generally, no, me violating your NDA won't escalate to the government shooting me, no matter how uncooperative I am.
- jml7c5 5y agoIf the defendant is ordered to pay damages and refuses, then the government does step in eventually, doesn't it? A continued refusal to comply eventually leads to arrest. That does not necessarily involve a gun, but presumably parent commenter is using the phrase for rhetorical effect. Ultimately, enforcing (almost) any law does come down to use of force if the guilty party is intransigent enough. Exceptions are when some thing can be "snatched" away and held truly inaccessible to the guilty party, such that they cannot possibly retrieve it.
- mwint 5y agoWage garnishment is a pretty effective way to collect civil judgements sans violence, I think. Not sure what happens if you have a civil judgement entered against you and then quit having income. (Not reporting income is probably a real Crime, and they’d go after you for that)
- gruez 5y ago>If the defendant is ordered to pay damages and refuses, then the government does step in eventually, doesn't it? A continued refusal to comply eventually leads to arrest. 1. debtor's prison isn't a thing anymore 2. look up "judgement-proof"