I'm not American, but I do know that libel laws in the US would prevent this. They did not witness whatever event this was, they are relying on witnesses. Pub

I'm not American, but I do know that libel laws in the US would prevent this. They did not witness whatever event this was, they are relying on witnesses. Publishing those witness statements would be negative to the witnesses, the accused, and to defcon. Basically you want everyone to put themselves in a compromising situation to satisfy your curiosity. They have told him why he is banned. If he wants to share that information with you or the general public, he is free to do so.