4 ms·
Asynchronous teams are fantastic when the work itself can be cleanly divided up into fully isolated individual responsibilities and the team is great about resp
by PragmaticPulp 5y ago
Asynchronous teams are fantastic when the work itself can be cleanly divided up into fully isolated individual responsibilities and the team is great about respecting each other.
Beyond that, going fully asynchronous becomes a huge disadvantage to anyone trying to accomplish something that requires cross-team or even multi-person collaboration on a reasonable timeframe. The amount of round-trip back and forth communication that slows everything down can become staggering in no time.
On small, tight-knit teams this is largely mitigated by everyone's willingness to jump in and help synchronously when necessary. Once you grow to the point of a big remote organization where people don't really know each other, it just becomes a game of dodging questions and delaying responses until the other person solves their own problems. The more engaged you are, the more work you end up taking on. Some (sadly, many) people see this as an opening to make themselves as scarce as possible and only do the neatly packaged work that comes directly from their managers. As a manager, you end up mediating all sorts of communication issues that would simply disappear if the team had some core working hours.
- ThalesX 5y agoGiven what you say stands, this would give small, tight-knit teams and truly agile big remote organizations a competitive advantage. This sits well with me.