3 ms·
>specific to the internal affairs of Canada. It's a Canada policy, but is specific to crossing the border from the US. "Specific to internal affairs" is a str
by beerandt 5y ago
>specific to the internal affairs of Canada.
It's a Canada policy, but is specific to crossing the border from the US.
"Specific to internal affairs" is a stretch at best.
>Shining Path, the Contras, the Medellín Cartel, or any other faction.
You forgot BLM.
- 8note 5y agoIt's a matter of sovereignty who you let in and under what conditions. There are some treaty specifics, but as far as Americans are involved, it's those treaties, and you're free to renegotiate them
- Apocryphon 5y agoBLM is based in the United States, so that reference would not make sense unless you are talking about funding crossing state lines. > It's a Canada policy, but is specific to crossing the border from the US. Up until the blockade of the border, it was an internal matter entirely, but you are correct here. If the border situation escalates, then the OAS needs to get involved to mediate a ceasefire and ensure that free and fair elections can take place.
- beerandt 5y agoCanada and international donations to blm is.
- Apocryphon 5y agoAre you alleging that the Logan Act has been violated? That is a serious accusation.