3 ms·
> I would call it usable, but not "very usable". For normal people, Chrome(ium) UX is better. I can't imagine why you would say this. Could you point out some
by feanaro 5y ago
> I would call it usable, but not "very usable". For normal people, Chrome(ium) UX is better.
I can't imagine why you would say this. Could you point out some concrete examples of better UX?
- selfhoster11 5y agoThe hamburger menu, for one. It's extremely unintuitive. Not the fact that it uses a hamburger icon, but that even simple things like accessing the full list of my bookmarks involve multiple clicks. If you know the keyboard shortcuts then it's not a problem, but I want common UI items to be accessible from the UI. Besides that, the UI is just sluggish a lot of the time. It feels that Chrome(ium) has a far better latency response.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- feanaro 5y agoBut isn't accessing bookmarks exactly the same in Chrome(ium)? Firefox: 1. Hamburger menu > 2. Bookmarks > 3. Manage bookmarks Chrome(ium): 1. Three-dot menu > 2. Bookmarks > 3. Bookmark manager In both cases you get a list of bookmarks on step 2 and you get a full, searchable, editable view in step 3. The global shortcut for the third step is the same in both (ctrl + shift + o).