3 ms·
> Noting that "the U.S. and NATO are pouring in high-tech weaponry and training up Ukraine's armed forces, making it a much more militarily capable foe," Gill w
by d23 5y ago
> Noting that "the U.S. and NATO are pouring in high-tech weaponry and training up Ukraine's armed forces, making it a much more militarily capable foe," Gill wrote Friday that "from where the Russians are sitting, the deployment of billions of dollars worth of new U.S. and U.K. military hardware on its borders is a sign of escalation, rather than defense."
I may just be ill-informed, so I'm completely willing to hear alternative views, but isn't this complete lunacy? Putin has been encroaching on the Ukraine and pushing to invade it for a while now, and has already invaded Georgia and Crimea, no? And he's been lining up the military on the border? How is the US and NATO mobilizing in response not defense? Is the claim here that Putin is genuinely afraid of the US invading Russia and simply operating in self-defense?
Edit: I'm being downvoted, which seems strange, considering there hasn't been a substantive response to why this is false.
- Retric 5y agoIn politics inconvenient truths are generally ignored. Russia would prefer Ukraine to be easily crushed even if they don’t actually invade it’s useful for them to be surrounded by weaker countries. What they say is largely just for public consumption not political talks.
- irthomasthomas 5y agoRussia has been carrying out the same military exercise on its Ukraine border for the last decade. But NATO flooding Ukraine with arms is new, I think.
- d23 5y agoYou're saying there is no actual military buildup by Russia on the Ukraine border right now? Do you have evidence for this?
- tdeck 5y agoA different comment on this post provided some sources of prior buildups: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30337335 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30337335