That's not what the ruling stipulated-it just says the developer must be given the option of presenting alternate payment providers. Presumably the court thinks

That's not what the ruling stipulated-it just says the developer must be given the option of presenting alternate payment providers. Presumably the court thinks the developers thus should be able to push an update that includes this additional functionality, whereas Apple's bizarre efforts at [non-]compliance require apps with non-Apple payment option to be a separate SKU (which is not really "develop a separate app" as they've described it here, but certainly is a barrier Apple has chosen to erect in an attempt to undermine this ruling.)