4 ms·

That's a nice way of spelling doxxing.Remember "it's bad only when the other side does it".

• barbazoo 5y ago
  Publishing the already publicly available data isn't doxxing yet. This is necessary information the public needs to see to start estimating how much of that money is coming from foreign donors so we can question why and deal with it accordingly.
  • totony 5y ago
    I'm eager to see passwords leaks as well as all the other personal info leaks for the last decade be exposed then. Remember the Desjardins leak a few years ago? Is that OK? I fail to see why a leak is considered "public information" to you or why specifically it's ok for this case but not equifax, desjardins and all the others.
    • 8note 5y ago
      Understanding american meddling in canadian affairs is handy for canadian sovereignty.
      • totony 5y ago
        Does that justify the doxxing? What about the informations of Canadians? Collateral damage? Law enforcement has enough tools to investigate stuff like this. The public doesn't need access to everyone's information just in case it's "helpful."
  • hunterb123 5y ago
    Didn't seem necessary when it was the Hunter laptop, or the Ashley diary, or the DNC emails. Those things were ignored in the MSM as "illegally obtained" and "disinformation" and banned from discussion on social sites "due to hacking". But this civilian donor list is "necessary information" and the media is licking their chops wanting to broadcast it for their brown shirt goons. Disgusting.