5 ms·
Funny because we (B2B SAAS company) literally built an in house tool to manage customers at a "Company" level rather than Contacts/Users. However we decided to
by codegeek 5y ago
Funny because we (B2B SAAS company) literally built an in house tool to manage customers at a "Company" level rather than Contacts/Users. However we decided to switch to Helpscout as we didn't wanna self host and it has been a bad experience with helpscout. They have no concept of "Company" and we are honestly considering switching back to our home grown tool. There definitely is need for tool like this.
I will be happy to beta test if you are offering.
- abbott4321 5y agoFront also rolled out support for "accounts" last year which sounds exactly like what you are trying to do. It aggregates a set of contacts under an account and lets you use accounts through the whole application. You can see all of the communication from a company across all channels (support, sales, success), get automatically notified if someone else in the organization replied recently, do routing/classification based on account data (account size, account owners), and filter analytics by account. Worth a look if you're considering going off Helpscout.
- rekoros 5y agoJust to clarify, you get this account-level view from the perspective of the vendor, correct? (i.e. if I'm an end user and I use Front to get support from my vendor - will my colleagues be able to get involved in sorting through my issue?)
- rekoros 5y agoHelpScout is a super competent team inbox solution, but yes - it's simply not designed for supporting an entire company. We would love for you to beta test! You can kick the tires by signing up and inviting a few colleagues (ping us in support to see what it feels like), or I can walk you through a demo.
- codegeek 5y agoThanks for replying. I will test it out and let you know. I would also encourage to really "disrupt" (Yes I used the word here) pricing for support tools. Per agent/user pricing (zendesk/freshdesk/helpscout etc) really adds up for a startup/smaller teams and I would encourage you to consider flat rate pricing with limits of different types.
- rekoros 5y agoI know what you mean. We're doing a few things in terms of pricing that (I think) are unusual for support tools: - Unlimited read access to everyone at your company (because customer support conversations should be accessible to all team members). Say you have 15 people, but only 3 are customer-facing certified - if we charged $15/month, it would be $45/month for 15 people. (This also means unlimited write access in internal rooms - think of it as free Slack;) - No charge for two customer-facing agents, which would cover most bootstrapped or pre-seed startups; - Off-the-bat SSO; not a part of enterprise plan.
- codegeek 5y agoNice. 1st and 3rd points are gold. I would say that for read only, at least allow internal team members to comment/note on customer issues and consider that read only as well. That way, we can have more team members be involved in internal notes etc for a customer but only charge if we are replying ? Or may be add role for agents as "commenter vs customer facing" . We ourselves offer SSO with our lower plans and that is very popular. The whole old school model of "SSO only available with Enterprise" needs to die soon.
- rekoros 5y agoYes, totally agree on the SSO part. The whole reader/writer part is pretty confusing. I made a brief video that explains a possible workflow: https://www.loom.com/share/7f644774c3114e65b779d13d1c6eda18 https://www.loom.com/share/7f644774c3114e65b779d13d1c6eda18
- gingerlime 5y agowe’re B2C and whilst I love helpscout, they seem to have stopped innovating or caring about solving some pain points (in our case multi-language support). I can kinda understand most of the time, but some things just feel a bit too tight fisted to me… They still seem to be better than zendesk and intercom, but I really wish they would push the envelope a bit more…