4 ms·
You’d be wrong. First of all, the cameras would have watermarks signed with private keys to authenticate the video so the deepfakes won’t matter. Secondly, no
by EGreg 5y ago
You’d be wrong.
First of all, the cameras would have watermarks signed with private keys to authenticate the video so the deepfakes won’t matter.
Secondly, no need to prove anything, in order to do the AI thing and precrime.
And thirdly, when it comes to court cases, however you make arguments, the AI can help you make lots of plausible info for parallel construction.
- helloworld11 5y agoyou specifically mentioned cameras being everywhere for the sake of collecting evidence, and then right after spoke of deepfakes that make ANY camera footage subject to fakery. So whether what you say about watermarks and so forth is correct or not, based on your own words, I still see something of a contradiction.
- EGreg 5y ago"for the sake of collecting evidence" is your interpretation. I said: "Ubiquitous cameras and wifi that can easily track everyone by their appearance, gait, heartbeat and other signatures etc. become commonplace."