> Difficult case because that would also implicate judges and public prosecutors I don't think judges would be implicated here. the court relies on expert witn

> Difficult case because that would also implicate judges and public prosecutors I don't think judges would be implicated here. the court relies on expert witnesses to explain what to do with a piece of evidence. For example, if someone is convicted based on DNA evidence, you would have an expert in DNA matching explain the probability of this happening by chance. If a supposed expert in the software testified that this is impossible to happen unless money actually went missing, and that witness appeared credible, then what can you do?