4 ms·
I think some degree of "weeding out" is required. Just because you got into Fancy University College it doesn't mean you are automatically great at all academic
by deltarholamda 5y ago
I think some degree of "weeding out" is required. Just because you got into Fancy University College it doesn't mean you are automatically great at all academic endeavors. If you sail through Math 101 and 102, and run into a brick wall in Math 202, maybe you aren't as great at math as you think you are. Or maybe you need to work harder.
We tend to think of higher education as some sort of inalienable right to all peoples across the world, but it just isn't. Everybody has a ceiling. Higher education, and especially elite universities, should be for those whose ceiling is higher than the average bear.
That said, until you get into the later years of higher education, "weeding out" doesn't have hard and fast boundaries. Atypical thinkers may have a blind spot that needs a different teaching method, or possibly "departmental policy" is just garbage ideas ossified into departmental culture. It's always worth revisiting those Chesterton Fences to see if they need to be altered or moved, or even torn down.
- oblio 5y ago> Maybe you aren't as great at math as you think you are. Or maybe you need to work harder. Sorry, but that's just silly. Extremely silly. You don't weed students out through the <<teaching process>>. You weed them out through exam results...
- zozbot234 5y agoHigh standards are quite distinct from the indiscriminate "weeding out" effect that's most often the outcome of bad teaching. If you make every effort to teach Math 202 in the most effective way but also expect stellar results from everyone, that's not the same as what the Princeton student experienced.