4 ms·
>Ubiquitous cameras and wifi that can easily track everyone by their appearance, gait, heartbeat and other signatures etc. become commonplace. >Deepfakes that m
by helloworld11 5y ago
>Ubiquitous cameras and wifi that can easily track everyone by their appearance, gait, heartbeat and other signatures etc. become commonplace.
>Deepfakes that make any sort of video evidence useless, while AI creates plausible “parallel construction” to win court cases against anyone
I'd say that those two scenarios directly contradict each other in many ways.
- EGreg 5y agoYou’d be wrong. First of all, the cameras would have watermarks signed with private keys to authenticate the video so the deepfakes won’t matter. Secondly, no need to prove anything, in order to do the AI thing and precrime. And thirdly, when it comes to court cases, however you make arguments, the AI can help you make lots of plausible info for parallel construction.
- helloworld11 5y agoyou specifically mentioned cameras being everywhere for the sake of collecting evidence, and then right after spoke of deepfakes that make ANY camera footage subject to fakery. So whether what you say about watermarks and so forth is correct or not, based on your own words, I still see something of a contradiction.
- EGreg 5y ago"for the sake of collecting evidence" is your interpretation. I said: "Ubiquitous cameras and wifi that can easily track everyone by their appearance, gait, heartbeat and other signatures etc. become commonplace."