I think no one will try to persuade you that the terms are not incorrect. But I think they are good enough for explaining the problem they are trying to solve.

I think no one will try to persuade you that the terms are not incorrect. But I think they are good enough for explaining the problem they are trying to solve. I wouldn’t say that they are ”intentionally misleading”, more like trying to be a good name for the market while intentionally disregarding any technical accuracy.